Fat Women: No Place For The Attractive Anywhere

The Huffington Post has always been known for repeating liberal slogans without doing much thinking. It’s amazing how liberals will read the same crap over and over again, never an original thought, just a different person saying the same thing, and nobody notices it. I am not talking about writing on the same topic, which is ok. I’m talking about literally saying the same thing every day and not realizing it.

A recent Huffington Post article repeated the assault on female attractiveness using the typical liberal slogans. The most recent target are the Brandy Melville stores that cater to the non-overweight girls. “Who is the Brandy Melville girl? One look at the brand’s website and Instagram account reveals her: young, white, skinny and long-legged.” Oh the horror! They are pretty and they are white. How can HuffPo not wage a Jihad against a store catering to them.

Rachel Simmons, co-founder of the Girls Leadership Institute, a national nonprofit group, said Brandy Melville puts teen girls through the “paces of the popularity jungle,” recreating the challenge of having to be the best and coolest in school…

“They’re getting a really toxic message of what makes them worthy,” she said. “All that matters is your body type.”

Those who fail never want any competition. An unsuccessful man doesn’t want to be judged on his accomplishments, and an ugly woman doesn’t want to be judged on her looks. But no matter how much you stump your feet and tell everyone to stop, every living being judges all those around them based on the pecking order. Even the expression “pecking order” comes from the hierarchy among chickens who used standards applicable to them to determine who’s best and who’s worst. Humans have different standards from chickens, bears or dolphins, but we have the same natural, biological drive to rank all those around us, and to try to achieve the highest rank we can.

Feminist beliefs aside, girls are not idiots who are being lied to by the media what’s attractive and what’s not while they are empty vessels that don’t understand anything. They know what men like, and men like what they are biologically programmed to like. This is why women and girls try to make themselves attractive to men and boys, and the reverse.

There are plenty of stores for the fat. Big and Tall. Plus Sized stores. Why can’t there be one store for girls who are size 0 or size 2. Do they not deserve “safe space” for themselves? Why can’t they walk into a store and know that everything on the shelf fits them and they don’t need to go through parachute-like size-16 dresses to find something that suits them?

Why? Because size 2 is more appealing than size 16? Because girls want to be size 2, but not size 16? Because guys want to be with girls who are size 2 and not size 16? That’s right! Feminists are mad that there is a store for the thin precisely because they are pretty, while “plus sized stores” are meant for those as ugly as them.

Feminist Body Type

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Woman Writes How Terrible It Is Being Ugly, Then Turns Feminist

In our past articles (here and here), we took a consistent position that feminism stems from ugly women feeling bad. Below is a cry of a woman who describes herself as ugly. We are not posting this to make fun of the ugly or to be cruel to them. The heart breaks reading this. But everyone – male and female – is judged in comparison to the rest of the gender. We are graded “on a curve” and therefore some of us will always be seen as prettier than others. When people are compared to one another for any quality, from sexual desirability to job skills, some people will wind up at the top, while others will be left in the misery of the bottom. This woman wound up on the very bottom.

I’m ugly. I know I’m ugly. I have known that I am ugly since I was twelve years old.

The world of an ugly woman is different to that of a beautiful woman in so many ways I could not begin to explain it all. I can, however, briefly sketch the strange differences I have observed between how society treats ugly women, and how society treats beautiful women.

My sister is beautiful. I have many beautiful friends. I live in the same world as beautiful women. I am not one of them. They are celebrated, remembered, asked after. People are good to beautiful women, even when beautiful women are indifferent, hostile or even cruel in return. People remember my sister’s name and instantly forget me. When we are introduced to new people together, nine times out of ten if I meet that person again they will immediately ask where my sister is, how she is, what she is doing. I am never asked about myself and she is never asked about me. My beautiful friends are photographed by friends and acquaintances. I am silently left out of the records of social events. I am erased from history because I am too ugly to be photographed. Strangers compliment my sister and my friends, strangers insult and ridicule me.

Notice that her tragedy stems from how important looks are to her as a woman. She desperately wants to be pretty. She admits “I know I am ugly. There is literally nothing I can do about it. I’m trying my best already!” The exclamation mark is there to show just how much she wants to pretty.

She wants men to notice her, an act that feminists describe as “objectification.” But she knows that men don’t want her. As we described before, she’s the one being treated like an object, a non-sexual object, while pretty women are “celebrated, remembered, asked after.”

Strangers feel free to insult and ridicule her because she’s an object. They can’t fathom to view her in a humanized way because humanization comes from sexualization. This is simple biology: living being have a drive to reproduce and their energy is best spent going after someone with whom they want to mix their genes, while brushing aside the non-desirables who are no more than objects to them.

Naturally, this woman then turns feminist:

Men might think that perhaps they live in the same world that I do, but they don’t. Even ugly men live in a different world to me. I have never seen, or heard of, a man experiencing the same level of public condemnation for their looks that I have faced. The most recent example I can think of is the man who stopped in the street last week to tell me that I shouldn’t be wearing tinsel on my head like my friends (we were going for Christmas drinks) because I was so ugly. This is not rare for me and this is not new. This has been my life since I was a young teenager. When I see discussions about catcalling I want to scream at the people who tell women that they should be complimented. What should I do when someone yells at me, unprovoked, that I am an ugly minger? I know I am ugly. There is literally nothing I can do about it. I’m trying my best already!

There is hope for ugly men in popular culture. We celebrate the story of the ugly, or at least not conventionally attractive male, who finally gets his, inevitably beautiful, female crush to realise how much he is worth on the inside and how worthy he is of her love. That story never happens in reverse. There are just no famous actresses that are anything other than conventionally beautiful.

Nobody writes books about ugly women. No one makes films or plays, or songs or art of any sort about ugly women. In fact, we’re not there at all. In popular culture, and culture stretching back as far as human memory goes, ugly women are not there. We don’t exist and nobody talks about us. Beautiful women are the only women we see or hear about, and most crushingly, the only women we remember. The ugly ones, no matter what they do, seem to be simply invisible. Invisible or evil and bad.

We shouldn’t be surprised by this, though, we tell children stories of the good, beautiful princess and the evil, ugly witch. We make this happen.

I am ugly. I will not be remembered. I will never be the protagonist of any story told. I hate being ugly. I hate myself. The end.

This is a standard canard of the ugly feminists. Men aren’t judged the same way as women, therefore, they aren’t judged at all. This is preposterous. Men are judged based on who’s a better man and who’s worse. Do looks matter as much? No, but qualities like confidence, leadership, decisiveness, financial success, charisma are all far more important to men than women.

A man who loses confidence drops to the bottom of the curve. These push-overs are ignored, harassed, insulted, ridiculous, robbed and even beaten. Women feel free to make them work for them and give them money by pretending that they may pay them any attention, then turn around and act shocked that the man ever thought that his efforts and spending will get him to so much as hold the woman’s hand.

The world of the very undesirable men is worse than that of the very undesirable women because women are rarely going to be robbed by men or beaten by fellow women just for their undesirability.

At the end of her cry, the woman finally latches on to the one hope that all the feminists have: we can change the society, she proclaims. We can force men to pay attention to the ugly, she hopes. But, of course, we cannot. As she admits, that this is how things have been “stretching back as far as human memory goes.” That’s because this is nature. Feminist lies about other societies notwithstanding not caring about female looks, those who are sexually undesirable – men and women – are treated horribly. Even if we all suddenly become nice to them, just the knowledge that nobody wants you is a monstrous burden to carry. We are made to reproduce. The world voting democratically and unanimously that you shouldn’t reproduce like all the living beings is the ultimate objectification.

Posted in Ugly Feminists' Whining & Lying | Leave a comment

Should Average Men Be Professional Athletes?

Should average men be professional athletes? After all, every boy growing up wanted to be an athlete of some kind, whether a basketball player or a race car driver or a fighter. Then we grew up and realized that we aren’t good enough. This realization meant disappointment for us. Does that mean that professional sports should be made up of overweight, weak, short men? That would make us feel better, wouldn’t it? Knowing that we are superior athletes to the pros? On first thought it would, but of course, it really wouldn’t because we’d quickly realize under that system, being a pro athlete was nothing to be proud of; it would be just a bunch of disgusting men making fools of themselves.

This is the same logic as that of the feminists who are demanding that “average-sized” women become models and Miss America contestants.

Feminists were once little girls. While boys dreamed about scoring the buzzer-beating 3-pointer, girls dreamed of being pretty women. It is not culture that makes women want to be sexually-desirable, it is nature. Men too want to be sexually desirable, but the standards for men are different: height more important than weight, success (ability to provide) more important than looks, etc.

The little future feminists looked around and began to size themselves up against the prettiest women around, just as boys compared themselves to the best athletes. While almost all realized that they are not the best of the best, some knew that they were prettier than other girls in school and boys were willing to drop everything to do them a favor just for the honor of spending a few minutes with them. Other girls couldn’t get the attention of boys, who played pranks on them instead of doing them favors.

Some cried. Others demanded that boys treat them as if they are pretty. But while people can be intimidated in a public setting,they cannot in private when they are watching TV. So as the little ugly girls grew up and became feminists, they began to demand that we put average looking women on TV. But by average, they mean someone as ugly as them so that others’ beauty won’t make them feel bad.

The LA Times and then Jezebel wrote about the latest Miss USA contest. The first sentence on Jezebel immediately claimed that it was “utterly meaningless,” though that had nothing to do with the rest of the article. Why is it utterly meaningless? Sure, it doesn’t cure cancer, but a celebration of beauty is not meaningless. Ugly feminists may want it to be that way, but it is not. It was important to say that the contest is “utterly meaningless” because they want to say that their ugliness and other women’s beauty means nothing, but lying, no matter how often. doesn’t make something true.

Jezebel then raged that Miss Indiana was size 4. Apparently, pretending that a woman who has no waist line and only a minor amount of fat on her gut is the prettiest woman in Indiana was not lying enough to subdue the Rage of the Ugly. We should pretend that beauty symbols are 39 years old, size 14, have a 37.5 inch waist, are 166.2 pounds at only 5-foot-3. Such a beauty queen’s BMI would have to be 33, making her extremely fat: anything over 30 is obese.

But what if we did parade short, fat, middle-aged women on a stage once a year? Ugly women would still feel ugly because these contestants would cease being symbols of beauty. Men would ogle other women as they looked for form that they find appealing, and feminists would demand that we close our eyes to the sight an appealing lady. And Miss USA contests would turn into a sad show where men would snicker as they looked at body shapes that provoke only one reaction: erectile dysfunction or more accurately, erectile discrimination.

And consider this: at a time when wars rage all over the world, when both our and global economy has been in the dumpster for a half a dozen years, what an LA Times female journalist decided to cover is the shortage of ugly, obese women presented to us as the greatest beauties of our generation. Why? Is it because beauty is utterly meaningless? No, it’s because ugly women desperately want to be pretty. Who cares about other continents if no normal man wants you and even Beta losers can’t get an erection when you take off your clothes?! Utterly meaningless? Their concern betrays that they really think that it’s not.

Posted in Double Standards | Leave a comment

Desirable Men and Women Do Not Get Abused

One fat feminist on Jezebel who goes by the moniker RawrIhavePi wrote:

I made a sport out of those creep messages back when I tried out OKC. I didn’t get that many messages simply because I was ‘full-figured’ – aka fat by most standards, so I mostly got chubby chasers and men specifically seeking girls with low self-esteem as easy lays.

Undesirable men and women get taken advantage of because nobody is interested in them. Women pretend to flirt with them only to get them to do something or to spend money, then play dumb that they never meant to lead the betas into believing that something could ever happen. Men too do not want to invest time or money into someone they aren’t really interested in long-term. “Put out or get out” is not a phrase one flings at a hot girl because they are worth investing in even if they don’t jump into your bed right away. But an ugly woman that you are having sex with only to increase your total score so you could claim a higher number of sex partners than your friends will get just this kind of attention.

There’s quality, then there’s quantity. A hot girl is quality. You don’t need to bang 5 women this month to get your friends’ respect if you have one beautiful girlfriend. But a guy who stumbles upon an unattractive woman doesn’t want his friends to think that he decided to settle up with the first female that said yes to him out of her own desperation. An ugly woman is quantity. She’s a number. You don’t show her off to your friends, you brag about the number of women you had sex with and she’s one of those numbers. For a man with options who is not desperate, she’s not worth sticking around for, she needs to put out immediately or leave your life so that you can either find a hot girlfriend or bang a bunch of quantity.

Feminists hate men because men treat them badly. They don’t want to spend time or money on them, they pay them no attention, they use them and then don’t even remember their names. At times, guys even play cruel jokes on them, jokes nobody would play on someone they attracted to.

Beautiful women don’t have to deal with this. Men treat them like valuable, breakable luxury. Their problem isn’t random guys demanding immediate sex, it’s that men are too afraid to approach them. They don’t have to worry about cruel jokes, instead their concern is that a man is afraid to be rough or at least dominant with them. Yes, pretty women have problems with men, but they are the opposite of the problems fat, ugly feminists have.

Posted in Alpha, Beta & Omega | 1 Comment

Ugly Women Pretending They Don’t Want Male Attention

In the previous post on the “objectification of women,” we wrote:

Finding someone attractive is humanizing them. Finding someone unacceptable for sex is objectifying them as objects that are only good if they are useful to you. But the truth hurts too much for the ugly feminists, so they attack men for being attracted to women. Their problem, of course, isn’t that men are attracted to women, but rather that men are attracted to other women, objectifying the feminists as unworthy anymore attention than a coffee maker or a football.

That is what the feminist assault on reason stems from: to admit the truth hurts too much, so ugly women pretend that life is better for them than for those who are beautiful, inventing fake problems that pretty women have. The terrible thing about being a woman is that men want them, say feminists, as they pretend to be outraged about how bad life must be as an attractive female. Pretty girls turn on men and this is obviously a horrible problem. These women put up pretty pictures in their dating profiles and men want them. The horror, yells Jezebel.

As proof, they cite that a man who pretended to be a woman did not enjoy sexual comments directed his way. That’s breaking news, isn’t it? A straight man does not enjoy advances from other men. Who’d have thunk?!

Of course he didn’t like these sexual comments. He’s straight. He likes women. He doesn’t want someone with facial hair who weighs 200 pounds to hit on him. If he did, he’d be gay… or he’d date a feminist. To a feminist who assumes that men and women are the same, that gender is just a social construct, it may make sense that a man reacts the same way a woman would, but it couldn’t be further from the truth. A woman expects you to flirt with her in situations where it is appropriate (dating sites, bars, singles events and in some situations regular gatherings if it looks like the two of you might have some chemistry) or else she’ll “friend zone” you and regard you as a scared loser, while wondering to her friends if you are gay. In fact, even if a woman isn’t attracted to him, a man who is confident enough to express his interest and go for what he wants suddenly becomes attractive to a woman.

Women enjoy the conversation turning flirty and sexual as much as men do. A lie perpetuated by the beta males is that women don’t want sex and are outraged by the mere mention of it. But women don’t want to talk about sex only with men they find unattractive (the beta males), just as men do not enjoy sexualizing a conversation with women they are uninterested in (the feminists). The one difference is that women expect men to take the lead and know how to do it. This is true for dancing, kissing, anything really. A man is supposed know how to do it. When a man turns a conversation sexual and does it in a way that shows his lack of understanding of how a woman thinks, what she finds tantalizing by playing a little game and what she finds repulsive, the woman is displeased. A man will give a woman credit for flirting even if she does so incompetently. A woman will simply walk away from an incompetent man.

But her experience in dealing with a man who doesn’t know how to flirt and turn the conversation into a grotesque form is not the same as a straight man’s reaction to advances from another man. A male finds homosexual advances repulsive. A woman finds an incompetent heterosexual advance to be an annoyance, but even an incompetent attempt to flirt will result in her having more respect for the guy than him being a scared little woose.

And yes, some men, usually young and/or inexperienced guys, do take things too far too quickly or in the wrong direction. But dealing with a weirdo is a small price to pay for receiving the attention of attractive, built, successful, confident Alpha Males that no feminist could ever get.

Posted in Ugly Feminists' Whining & Lying | Leave a comment

Feminists Are Mad That Alpha Males Don’t Want to Kiss Them

The iconic picture of a sailor kissing a young woman is sexual assault, claim feminists who want the statute depicting this removed. Take a look at this picture:

Feminists

Consent to anything, sexual or otherwise, does not need to be verbal or in writing. It can be judged based on a person’s actions. You sit down at a friend’s table and he puts candy on the table. You don’t ask permission and take a candy. Your friend doesn’t object and continues to be very friendly to you. Is that theft? Should you be arrested? Of course not! Consent is based on the person’s actions.

Look at the woman in this picture. If she doesn’t want to be kissed, no woman in history has ever wanted to be kissed. Her right leg is curling up where you can tell that her whole body is quivering from the pleasure she’s getting. She’s relaxed, her arms are dropped down, she bends down into a position where a kiss can actually happen. Her whole body is so into it that her mind can no longer think about anything other than being in that moment.

Instead, the feminists say “The sailor could have laughed with these women, hugged them, asked them if he could kiss them with joy… No, he chose to grab them with a firm hand to kiss them. It was an assault.” Because women just love sheepish men who tell them knock-knock jokes and are afraid to make the move and need verbal permission to act like a man. Had he asked, no woman would’ve agreed because she would’ve been disgusted by his cowardice. No woman’s leg has ever curled up like that when she’s kissing after being asked for permission.

And what’s worse, they are attacking the guy for grabbing the girl with his “firm hand.” Are you kidding me?! Who are they talking to, people who’ve never met a woman? The idea that women don’t want to be grabbed with a firm hand can only be fed to a lonely teenage boy. Any man who’s been with a woman knows that this is the only way a woman wants to be touched and finds a scared man who’s afraid of her to be sexually repulsive.

The feminists are women too. They know this full well. They want a man to grab them with a firm hand, to do it spontaneously, to be overcome by their beauty, to care about nothing else in his world except the pleasure of her lips on his. But feminists are ugly. Ugly and fat. Too lazy to lose weight, take care of their hair and otherwise maintain themselves on a long-term basis, when these women were young, they thought they could pull on a tight mini-skirt and put a slab of makeup on their fat-deformed face and suddenly become attractive. But faced with mockery in response, they eventually chose to give up and yell at men, claiming their beauty standards and sexual desires are illegitimate.

They pretend that not taking care of themselves, not wearing makes, not taking care of their hair, not wearing nice clothes is an act of political defiance. It isn’t. It is a response to men rejecting them. And part of this is to claim that they never wanted to be kissed in the first place. Think about it: how would you act if you were the fat, ugly girl standing next to the beautiful girl kissed by a hot Alpha Male? You’d claim that you didn’t want to be kissed anyway. You’d claim that the Alpha Male is an asshole that you would never want. You’d claim that what you really want is the only thing you can get, a nice Beta herb who will ask your permission to kiss you… or to breath. An indecisive, scared little boy that everyone takes advantage of; so scared of everyone including his woman that he’s afraid to take any step without making sure nobody will punish him for it.

But they do want to be kissed by the Alpha Male. When they close their eyes in bed at night, they see an image of themselves being grabbed by his firm hand and kissed in a way no Beta ever could. Then they wake up and realize that their fantasy will never come true. And so they demand that we take down this monument because it only serves as a reminder to them of their lack of desirability.

Posted in Alpha, Beta & Omega | 3 Comments

Beauty Double Standards

In our first blog entry, we wrote:

men and women are judged differently seeing as we have different bodies, hormones and chromosomes, the feminists have a never-ending list of “concerns” and “double standards” as to why a given standard applies to women by not to men, forgetting that there are plenty of standards that apply to men, but not women.

This is a particular concern of feminists. It justifies everything they say. “You see, men can be 200 pounds, but women cannot. There. There! You see, feminists win. This is proof that women have it bad and standards of beauty must be changed.”

This makes perfect sense to an fat ugly feminist. See, she’s not ugly, you are just putting up unfair obstacles in front of her. Of course, if a woman is not fat, making 200 pound beasts more attractive at her expense doesn’t seem like the coolest idea. Ever met a hot woman who’s an angry feminist? Yeah, well neither have I. Why would a desirable woman want to change beauty standards to make herself less attractive? More importantly, she’s not so deluded by her anger to think that a person’s sexual desire – something that isn’t controlled by any part of the brain that is in charge of rational, logical thought – can be changed by a government dictate.

But let us indulge the feminists. It’s true that a man can be 200 pounds and still be attractive, but a women cannot. Never mind that this man is probably taller, seeing as most men are taller than women. Never mind that he’s probably wider. Never mind that his bones are thicker and more dense. Never mind that he has more muscle. Never mind that a man can be 200 pounds and have a body fat of 6%, but a woman who’s 200 pounds is most certainly unhealthy.

Even if we assume that the man and the woman are equally fat, why should a woman be judged more harshly? Well, why is it ok for a woman to be 5-foot-2, but not for a man? For every standard that applies primarily to women, there’s a standard that applies primarily to men. But no angry feminist will ever admit to this.

Women should be thin, men should be tall.
Women should be pleasant, men should be confident.
Women should be able to take care of the house, men should be able to provide for the family.

These qualities were not chosen at random, they are based on the scientific way men and women are different. Testosterone makes men taller, stronger, more confident. Estrogen makes women’s personalities more pleasant, it makes their hair softer and shinier, it “helps decelerate height increase in females during puberty, accelerates burning of body fat and reduces muscle bulk,” among many other things.

Every quality that is desirable (or not) to the opposite gender is based on men displaying their testosterone-developed traits and women displaying their estrogen-developed traits. Feminists can deny this only because they are scientifically ignorant and they play to an audience that is as well. “Why is it ok for a man to be aggressive, but not for a woman,” screech the feminists. And it makes so much sense when you think about it logically without understanding basic science. “Yes, it’s not fair, I guess,” the people think.

But aggression is tied to testosterone. Estrogen has just the opposite effect. A man’s display of normal testosterone is viewed as a positive. A woman displaying a personality that is out of balance with what her hormones should be dictating is viewed negatively. Likewise, a woman who cries is viewed as normal because her hormones mean that she can be perfectly normal and cry. A man who cries because he’s watching a sad movie is viewed as disgusting because “a real man”, a man with normal hormonal development, would not do so. Feminists claim that this is all our culture, but of course, it’s not.

These are just a few qualities, but there are many more. There’s simply no quality that applies to women that doesn’t have a male equivalent. Being an equivalent doesn’t mean that the standard is the same, so feminists whine. But their whining is the product of their inability to compete with other women, rather than being faced with unattainable goals. For most women, it’s very attainable. The remainder become feminists.

Posted in Double Standards | Leave a comment