Hashtag #feministsareugly

Hashtag #feministsareugly on Twitter has been used by the feminists to promote the idea that they are not. For one, if looks are not important to the feminists, then why such need to post pictures for months upon months to prove otherwise. Two, feminists (and to some degree other women) tend to confuse pretty with lots of makeup. Being pretty means when you first open your eyes in the morning, when your hair is not done, you have no makeup, no fancy clothes, an upset look on your face because you wish to sleep instead of going to work, your looks are such that your man looks at you and thinks, “damn, can’t believe I got this.” Women put too much emphasis on the importance of makeup because of all the effort and money they sink into it. Admitting that it makes only a marginal difference would be admitting to the futility of their effort. But men know that makeup makes only a small difference to them.

Beautifying yourself is a way for women to compete with each other, which is why bags, for instance, are important even though they have nothing to do with looks. None of this matters to your man. Having a $22,000 bag may make your girlfriend jealous, but it will not make a man want to have sex with you. Having a 22 inch waist will. No amount of makeup, shoes or handbags will cover up your 40 inch waist or your double-chin.

Feminists post pictures of themselves in full makeup regalia thinking it makes them hot. In 9 cases out of 10, their comment “see, I’m a feminist and I’m cute” can only bring out laughter in a man. No sweetheart, you aren’t cute, you just have a lot of make up.

The only exception to this rule are 18-24 year old college girls who were brainwashed by their Professors into being feminist and have never been out in the real world to know the real truth. Two years after leaving their university, these girls will no longer be feminist if they are even mildly attractive.

Here’re a few feminists posting a Twitter picture of how hot she is to prove that feminists are not ugly.

Why Feminists Go Topless

Feminists like to go topless and even nude in public. Finding women attractive is “objectifying” them, say the feminists, so they need to run around naked as much as possible so that men stop being turned on by female nudity. But attractive women do not normally want to expose themselves in public because they do not want to devalue themselves. They want men to fight for their affection and their bodies. They know they can get men to do so because they are pretty. Average women need to fight harder for attention and accept less. Ugly women cannot have any standards. They must throw themselves on anything that may be willing to take them. They are also angry that nobody wants them. Running around topless or nude accomplishes both. On the one hand, it expresses their pent up anger. On the other, maybe if someone sees them naked, they will get turned on. They don’t care about devaluing their bodies because there’s nothing to devalue. Look at the picture above: what men would chase after these disasters if they ever dared to play hard to get?

Gender Discrimination Facts You’ll Never See In The Media

Below are some discrimination facts you’ll never see in the mainstream media or on feminist blogs:

 

• Men pay over 70% of income tax (and even more of other sources of income like the corporate tax and import tariffs), but consume only 25% of the spending by the government.
• Men get 63% longer sentences for the same crime.
• Court bias against men is at least 6 times bigger than racial bias.
• Women’s Cancers receive 15 times more funding than men’s
• Men make up 93% of work fatalities.
• 77% of homicide victims are men.
• 61% of child abuse is by the mother, but only 25% by the father (the remainder by others). Half of all child abuse is committed by single mothers.
• Over 70% of fathers and only 20% of mothers who win custody get no child support.

Hat tip to RealSexism.com for the information and the links.

This Is What A Feminist Looks Like

Many feminists will deny it, but the only women wearing these types of t-shirts are feminists. No attractive woman would ever wear something like this. This is an ugly woman who knows that trying to make herself look attractive would fail. It would only make it worse because people would realize that she tried and failed. So she gives up and pretends to be “one of the boys.” She jokes about farting so as to say, “see, I’m not trying to get you to find me attractive… that’s the only reason you don’t.” But the reality is that she simply gave up.

This is what feminists are. As evidenced by their constant anger at “beauty standards,” they would love to be seen as pretty, but they know that they aren’t. So they scream and yell about looks being unimportant, how they have personalities (which are almost always terribly unpleasant), that they have careers (usually government and non-profit jobs where they get to push their politics and not actually do something useful like stop crime, make shoes or heal a person) or whatever else. All of this is a deflection. They want to be pretty, but they know they can’t because they are too lazy to exercise or maintain a normal human diet, so they are are trying to make it look like they never wanted to be sexually appealing in the first place. Sure… that’s why they are so obsessed with beauty standards!

Despite Denials, Feminists Desperately Want To Be Sexy

We’ve maintained here from the start that modern feminism is nothing more than ugly women desperately trying to get the society to force men to be attracted to them. They assault “beauty standards” and complain why looks should not matter. But do they really want looks not to matter? No, they want do not, they just want their own looks to be attractive.

Consider Lena Dunham, Hollywood’s premier feminist. She’s fat and ugly, so she runs with the standard feminist narrative. And yet, she just bought sexy underwear and posted a picture of herself in what she perceives as a sexy pose. Feminists complain that male sexuality is based in power, but in women, such power is seen as a negative. But is she posing as a “strong, confident woman”? No, she crosses her legs, sticks out her hips and has a “come here” look in her face.

A similar pose by an attractive woman would provoke feminist outrage … because it would be attractive. Lena Dunham still looks like a piece of lard, so her near-nudity is “inspiring” and “body positive.” Next to her is a woman who’s actually attractive wearing the same bra and panties. The picture on the left gives you an immediate erection. The picture on the right immediately kills it.

But while the world may immediately perceive it that way,  it’s clearly not what Dunham intends. She wants to be pretty. She wants to be sexy. She’ll post pictures of herself in lacy underwear for the whole world to see just to get this feedback. All the success in the world, all the money she’s made, all her fame, all her talent, all her political influence… and none of it means anything because the first (conscious or unconscious) goal of any living being is to reproduce for if this drive didn’t exist and dominate over all else, that specie would disappear, and that means the opposite gender must find you sexy. Money, fame, talent and politics is all cultural. Sexiness is biological and it, therefore, dominates and remains an empty hole if unfulfilled even if everything else is perfect.

What’s Wrong With The Positive Body Image

What’s wrong with having a “positive body image”? The same thing that’s wrong with any lie: it’s false. It brainwashes slightly overweight young girls to keep on gaining weight thinking someone will find them attractive and they will be able to get a good husband after they put on another 100 pounds. They won’t. Either they will be alone or they will get a loser husband that no other woman wants, a guy that they themselves will be repulsed by.

Encouraging girls to make themselves attractive by controlling their weight isn’t abusive. Confusing them into thinking that they can be obese and still get a man they desire is the true form of abuse. What else can be more abusive than sentencing someone to a lifelong choice of being alone or having someone repulsive shove his tongue and penis inside your mouth and vagina? Men are visual. Men will not care how powerful, confident or interesting you are. Nobody wants to fuck Nancy Pelosi despite all her power, confidence and probably interesting stories. And yet, CEO after CEO, millionaire after millionaire goes after beautiful, thin young women. Men who have choices will choose beauty before anything else. Other qualities are important, but a man with choices will not even approach an unattractive woman to find out what her other qualities are.

Undesirable men who don’t have options may cling to the idea that personality beats looks, but that is only because they don’t have the option to go for looks. Granted, desirable men can have their cake and eat it too: beautiful women who are also smart, interesting, loyal. But given a choice between sharing your bed with a beautiful dummy or Nancy Pelosi, no man would choose Ms. Pelosi.

Katy Mixon: Beauty Queen or Propaganda Tool of Ugly Feminists?

Feminists like to argue that the media is pushing beauty standards upon us out of nothing. That is true, of course, but not in the way they mean it. There is real beauty out there. It is a beauty based on real things like the unconscious (or conscious) desire to find a mate who is healthy, able to reproduce and be our partner for a long time. Even when we merely want a one night stand, the beauty by which we judge our sex partner is based on the visual signs of health and reproductive fitness. We may accept a less attractive person as an acceptable one night stand, but we’ll still recognize that she is not pretty. The reason an uglier person may be more acceptable for a one night stand than marriage is the lack of investment in that person: we won’t have children with them, so we don’t have to worry about their terrible health and genetics.

Enter the media, much of which is feminist or at least afraid to stand up to the feminists. They tell us that in pre-Industrial times, as well as in starving nations today, being a little heavier was considered more attractive. This is accurate, but the issue is not presented properly: the reason starving societies prefer somewhat heavier partners is that starvation is more likely there than heart attacks, stroke and other fat-derived diseases. In wealthy societies, on the other hand, starvation is not an issue, but obesity is. Thus, our evolutionary drives cause us to select people with slower metabolism.

But in no society was obesity ever considered attractive. Except in Hollywood. Here, we have Katy Mixon presented as a spectacular beauty that a regular guy would be crazy to ask out on a date because someone that pretty can only break his heart. Mixon is a supporting actress on the show Mike and Molly which stars a fat man and his beyond morbidly obese wife as a regular couple (with Mike desperate to have sex with his wife despite her grotesque physique), and Katy Mixon as the local beauty. Really? This is Katy Mixon:

She’s flat out ugly. As a man, I cannot imagine touching her. She’s fat. She looks older than her 34 years of age. Her face may have been ok when she was skinny, but the lumps of fat all over make it awful as well. Feminists think that by putting lipstick on a pig, they will make the pig into a swan. They won’t. Putting a ton of makeup and flashy clothes on an ugly woman does not reduce her ugliness, nor does it make her in any way pretty. It just further flashes her terrible looks. Had she avoided flashy clothes and makeup, she’d draw less attention to how unattractive she is.

So why is she on TV? So that we could be told that fat is beautiful, and even the obese Molly is a normal woman who is desired by her husband. Feminists and Hollywood lie, but the truth remains: in real life, men find fat to be repulsive. No amount of propaganda will change that because our sexual desires are not driven by what we are told, but by our evolutionary urges to combine our genes and our lives with the healthy, not the morbid waiting spinning the wheel of what disease they are about to get.

So why do feminists think that the media is pushing beauty upon us? Because despite their propaganda, they know what beauty looks like. Every time an attractive woman is on TV, they moan, “look, they are making men think she’s beautiful!” They believe that men will view beautiful women as beautiful and don’t believe that Katy Mixon is going to convince any man of the same because they ultimately know the truth. They just want to explain it away by lying that beauty is just a media creation to make themselves feel better. Ultimately, however, they recognize the difference between a woman whom men will like and a woman whom men won’t.

Fat Women: No Place For The Attractive Anywhere

The Huffington Post has always been known for repeating liberal slogans without doing much thinking. It’s amazing how liberals will read the same crap over and over again, never an original thought, just a different person saying the same thing, and nobody notices it. I am not talking about writing on the same topic, which is ok. I’m talking about literally saying the same thing every day and not realizing it.

A recent Huffington Post article repeated the assault on female attractiveness using the typical liberal slogans. The most recent target are the Brandy Melville stores that cater to the non-overweight girls. “Who is the Brandy Melville girl? One look at the brand’s website and Instagram account reveals her: young, white, skinny and long-legged.” Oh the horror! They are pretty and they are white. How can HuffPo not wage a Jihad against a store catering to them.

Rachel Simmons, co-founder of the Girls Leadership Institute, a national nonprofit group, said Brandy Melville puts teen girls through the “paces of the popularity jungle,” recreating the challenge of having to be the best and coolest in school…

“They’re getting a really toxic message of what makes them worthy,” she said. “All that matters is your body type.”

Those who fail never want any competition. An unsuccessful man doesn’t want to be judged on his accomplishments, and an ugly woman doesn’t want to be judged on her looks. But no matter how much you stump your feet and tell everyone to stop, every living being judges all those around them based on the pecking order. Even the expression “pecking order” comes from the hierarchy among chickens who used standards applicable to them to determine who’s best and who’s worst. Humans have different standards from chickens, bears or dolphins, but we have the same natural, biological drive to rank all those around us, and to try to achieve the highest rank we can.

Feminist beliefs aside, girls are not idiots who are being lied to by the media what’s attractive and what’s not while they are empty vessels that don’t understand anything. They know what men like, and men like what they are biologically programmed to like. This is why women and girls try to make themselves attractive to men and boys, and the reverse.

There are plenty of stores for the fat. Big and Tall. Plus Sized stores. Why can’t there be one store for girls who are size 0 or size 2. Do they not deserve “safe space” for themselves? Why can’t they walk into a store and know that everything on the shelf fits them and they don’t need to go through parachute-like size-16 dresses to find something that suits them?

Why? Because size 2 is more appealing than size 16? Because girls want to be size 2, but not size 16? Because guys want to be with girls who are size 2 and not size 16? That’s right! Feminists are mad that there is a store for the thin precisely because they are pretty, while “plus sized stores” are meant for those as ugly as them.

Woman Writes How Terrible It Is Being Ugly, Then Turns Feminist

In our past articles (here and here), we took a consistent position that feminism stems from ugly women feeling bad. Below is a cry of a woman who describes herself as ugly. We are not posting this to make fun of the ugly or to be cruel to them. The heart breaks reading this. But everyone – male and female – is judged in comparison to the rest of the gender. We are graded “on a curve” and therefore some of us will always be seen as prettier than others. When people are compared to one another for any quality, from sexual desirability to job skills, some people will wind up at the top, while others will be left in the misery of the bottom. This woman wound up on the very bottom.

I’m ugly. I know I’m ugly. I have known that I am ugly since I was twelve years old.

…

The world of an ugly woman is different to that of a beautiful woman in so many ways I could not begin to explain it all. I can, however, briefly sketch the strange differences I have observed between how society treats ugly women, and how society treats beautiful women.

My sister is beautiful. I have many beautiful friends. I live in the same world as beautiful women. I am not one of them. They are celebrated, remembered, asked after. People are good to beautiful women, even when beautiful women are indifferent, hostile or even cruel in return. People remember my sister’s name and instantly forget me. When we are introduced to new people together, nine times out of ten if I meet that person again they will immediately ask where my sister is, how she is, what she is doing. I am never asked about myself and she is never asked about me. My beautiful friends are photographed by friends and acquaintances. I am silently left out of the records of social events. I am erased from history because I am too ugly to be photographed. Strangers compliment my sister and my friends, strangers insult and ridicule me.

Notice that her tragedy stems from how important looks are to her as a woman. She desperately wants to be pretty. She admits “I know I am ugly. There is literally nothing I can do about it. I’m trying my best already!” The exclamation mark is there to show just how much she wants to pretty.

She wants men to notice her, an act that feminists describe as “objectification.” But she knows that men don’t want her. As we described before, she’s the one being treated like an object, a non-sexual object, while pretty women are “celebrated, remembered, asked after.”

Strangers feel free to insult and ridicule her because she’s an object. They can’t fathom to view her in a humanized way because humanization comes from sexualization. This is simple biology: living being have a drive to reproduce and their energy is best spent going after someone with whom they want to mix their genes, while brushing aside the non-desirables who are no more than objects to them.

Naturally, this woman then turns feminist:

Men might think that perhaps they live in the same world that I do, but they don’t. Even ugly men live in a different world to me. I have never seen, or heard of, a man experiencing the same level of public condemnation for their looks that I have faced. The most recent example I can think of is the man who stopped in the street last week to tell me that I shouldn’t be wearing tinsel on my head like my friends (we were going for Christmas drinks) because I was so ugly. This is not rare for me and this is not new. This has been my life since I was a young teenager. When I see discussions about catcalling I want to scream at the people who tell women that they should be complimented. What should I do when someone yells at me, unprovoked, that I am an ugly minger? I know I am ugly. There is literally nothing I can do about it. I’m trying my best already!

There is hope for ugly men in popular culture. We celebrate the story of the ugly, or at least not conventionally attractive male, who finally gets his, inevitably beautiful, female crush to realise how much he is worth on the inside and how worthy he is of her love. That story never happens in reverse. There are just no famous actresses that are anything other than conventionally beautiful.

Nobody writes books about ugly women. No one makes films or plays, or songs or art of any sort about ugly women. In fact, we’re not there at all. In popular culture, and culture stretching back as far as human memory goes, ugly women are not there. We don’t exist and nobody talks about us. Beautiful women are the only women we see or hear about, and most crushingly, the only women we remember. The ugly ones, no matter what they do, seem to be simply invisible. Invisible or evil and bad.

We shouldn’t be surprised by this, though, we tell children stories of the good, beautiful princess and the evil, ugly witch. We make this happen.

I am ugly. I will not be remembered. I will never be the protagonist of any story told. I hate being ugly. I hate myself. The end.

This is a standard canard of the ugly feminists. Men aren’t judged the same way as women, therefore, they aren’t judged at all. This is preposterous. Men are judged based on who’s a better man and who’s worse. Do looks matter as much? No, but qualities like confidence, leadership, decisiveness, financial success, charisma are all far more important to men than women.

A man who loses confidence drops to the bottom of the curve. These push-overs are ignored, harassed, insulted, ridiculous, robbed and even beaten. Women feel free to make them work for them and give them money by pretending that they may pay them any attention, then turn around and act shocked that the man ever thought that his efforts and spending will get him to so much as hold the woman’s hand.

The world of the very undesirable men is worse than that of the very undesirable women because women are rarely going to be robbed by men or beaten by fellow women just for their undesirability.

At the end of her cry, the woman finally latches on to the one hope that all the feminists have: we can change the society, she proclaims. We can force men to pay attention to the ugly, she hopes. But, of course, we cannot. As she admits, that this is how things have been “stretching back as far as human memory goes.” That’s because this is nature. Feminist lies about other societies notwithstanding not caring about female looks, those who are sexually undesirable – men and women – are treated horribly. Even if we all suddenly become nice to them, just the knowledge that nobody wants you is a monstrous burden to carry. We are made to reproduce. The world voting democratically and unanimously that you shouldn’t reproduce like all the living beings is the ultimate objectification.

Should Average Men Be Professional Athletes?

Should average men be professional athletes? After all, every boy growing up wanted to be an athlete of some kind, whether a basketball player or a race car driver or a fighter. Then we grew up and realized that we aren’t good enough. This realization meant disappointment for us. Does that mean that professional sports should be made up of overweight, weak, short men? That would make us feel better, wouldn’t it? Knowing that we are superior athletes to the pros? On first thought it would, but of course, it really wouldn’t because we’d quickly realize under that system, being a pro athlete was nothing to be proud of; it would be just a bunch of disgusting men making fools of themselves.

This is the same logic as that of the feminists who are demanding that “average-sized” women become models and Miss America contestants.

Feminists were once little girls. While boys dreamed about scoring the buzzer-beating 3-pointer, girls dreamed of being pretty women. It is not culture that makes women want to be sexually-desirable, it is nature. Men too want to be sexually desirable, but the standards for men are different: height more important than weight, success (ability to provide) more important than looks, etc.

The little future feminists looked around and began to size themselves up against the prettiest women around, just as boys compared themselves to the best athletes. While almost all realized that they are not the best of the best, some knew that they were prettier than other girls in school and boys were willing to drop everything to do them a favor just for the honor of spending a few minutes with them. Other girls couldn’t get the attention of boys, who played pranks on them instead of doing them favors.

Some cried. Others demanded that boys treat them as if they are pretty. But while people can be intimidated in a public setting,they cannot in private when they are watching TV. So as the little ugly girls grew up and became feminists, they began to demand that we put average looking women on TV. But by average, they mean someone as ugly as them so that others’ beauty won’t make them feel bad.

The LA Times and then Jezebel wrote about the latest Miss USA contest. The first sentence on Jezebel immediately claimed that it was “utterly meaningless,” though that had nothing to do with the rest of the article. Why is it utterly meaningless? Sure, it doesn’t cure cancer, but a celebration of beauty is not meaningless. Ugly feminists may want it to be that way, but it is not. It was important to say that the contest is “utterly meaningless” because they want to say that their ugliness and other women’s beauty means nothing, but lying, no matter how often. doesn’t make something true.

Jezebel then raged that Miss Indiana was size 4. Apparently, pretending that a woman who has no waist line and only a minor amount of fat on her gut is the prettiest woman in Indiana was not lying enough to subdue the Rage of the Ugly. We should pretend that beauty symbols are 39 years old, size 14, have a 37.5 inch waist, are 166.2 pounds at only 5-foot-3. Such a beauty queen’s BMI would have to be 33, making her extremely fat: anything over 30 is obese.

But what if we did parade short, fat, middle-aged women on a stage once a year? Ugly women would still feel ugly because these contestants would cease being symbols of beauty. Men would ogle other women as they looked for form that they find appealing, and feminists would demand that we close our eyes to the sight an appealing lady. And Miss USA contests would turn into a sad show where men would snicker as they looked at body shapes that provoke only one reaction: erectile dysfunction or more accurately, erectile discrimination.

And consider this: at a time when wars rage all over the world, when both our and global economy has been in the dumpster for a half a dozen years, what an LA Times female journalist decided to cover is the shortage of ugly, obese women presented to us as the greatest beauties of our generation. Why? Is it because beauty is utterly meaningless? No, it’s because ugly women desperately want to be pretty. Who cares about other continents if no normal man wants you and even Beta losers can’t get an erection when you take off your clothes?! Utterly meaningless? Their concern betrays that they really think that it’s not.